Was talking to a guy on Friday who had been burgled recently. He was telling us how he, his wife and daughters had been in the house at the time and how the thievess

s had bashed their dog to keep it quiet, taken the keys to his and his wife’s cars, loaded them with their goods and driven off… all without then hearing a thing.

A neighbour *had* seen them leave and had chased them in *his* car but lost them near the local McDonald’s. The police had arrived quickly but the thieves had vanished. The cars were found abandoned and stripped in Mt. Druitt a 20 minute drive away down the new motorway link.

This was bad enough, but nothing that unusual really, but then he told us that *twenty* other houses had been robbed over the previous weeks in much the same way in the same few streets.

The area he lives is Bella Vista, a quite affluent area with expensive houses. All had dogs, all had alarm systems… and all ignored their dogs barks, and all had neglected to turn the alarms on at night!

We have learned our lesson… learning a lot lately… and have started turning the system on at night. It isn’t foolproof of course, but at the least the alarms should go off if someone enters the house, scaring them, alerting the neighbours and giving us a chance to respond (call the police, arm ourselves etc.).

Arming the alarm isn’t hard. We have a keypad outside our bedroom door and all we have to do is tap the code in before I walk into the bedroom… not rocket science. We just never used it.

Over the years we’ve occasionally heard of people being burgled around us so I’m not sure why this particular incident should have pushed into action, but it did. Maybe it was the ‘immediacy’ of having him talk to us. Maybe his security arrangements sounded too much like ours. Maybe I’d realised how blase we’d become over the years… no idea. But from now on the dogs are going to find me responding when they bark and the alarms are going to remain *on* whilst we sleep!

I really don’t want armed thugs wandering around the house robbing us whilst we sleep thanks.

And with that, I’m going back to bed. :D

I think that verdict was the least that could have been found. Yet there are *still* unanswered questions even allowing for the months of evidence and the twenty million pounds the inquest has cost. We still need information concerning the White Fiat Uno that reportedly sideswiped the car she was travelling in. We also need information regarding the driver of that car.

The conspiracy theory runs that the driver was a security agent posing as a paparazzo who hit the car at an opportune moment, then destroyed it (the Uno) by burning it. It was then claimed he later died of natural causes. The theory runs that this agent might have been ‘vanished’ deliberately to hide the source of the order her was given… or might well have been killed to cover up the source.

Either way this is as far as we go with the inquest… unless that is someone can find ‘the smoking gun’ that conspiracy theorists are convinced is out there somewhere. Do *you* have it??

Odd that the mother of little Shannon Matthews should be arrested for ‘perverting the course of justice’. Really makes you wonder what she did!

All sorts of suppositions could be correct… or wildly off the mark. My favourite was that the ‘kidnap’ was a complete fake from go to whoa and that they did it to see if they could capitalise on the ‘Maddie’ phenomenon and make a motza from the sympathy!!

It probably isn’t true, but it sounds feasible. At least I *hope* it isn’t true!!

Was reading a story about a father who arrived at the scene of a road crash where two of his young sons, his sister in law and two of her children were being loaded into stretchers. As he was checking on his 9 year old son, he was informed the 6 year old had died in the back of the ambulance.

The cause seems to be, yet again, a truck driver deciding he had time to run a red light rather than waiting for a few seconds until the lights changed in his favour. I say yet again because it happens here, with monotonous regularity… often with fatal consequences. We’ve seen trucks do it, we’ve seen *buses* do it. It’s an insane way to drive but it seems ‘might is right’ in the eyes of the drivers who know they’ll probably survive any crash.

Not so for the kids who died!!

I know we all whinge about the ‘big brother’ tactics of putting CCTV cameras everywhere, but if ever there was a case to be made for placing them in certain spots, then placing them on *all* traffic light controlled intersections has to be one of the strongest. It’s time *all* traffic lights were monitored and penalties for trucks running them leading to an automatic loss of licence – no arguments.

Full story of crash here.

September 17th saw us publishing a picture of a three year old New Zealand girl called Pumpkin (real name Xue Qian Xun) who’s father had apparently abandoned her at a railway station.

We later learned that Pumpkin’s mother had been found dead in the boot of the car outside the family home and that her father (Xue Nai Yin) had managed to evade capture for questioning and was loose somewhere in the USA.

There has been speculation he was trying to earn a living teaching ‘martial arts’ since he was a known expert.

Today we learn that he has been captured and is expected to be extradited to New Zealand to face questions about both his wife’s death and his apparent abandoning of Pumpkin.

To be honest I’m *amazed* that he was found! Seems he was recognised by neighbours after his picture was shown on ‘America’s Most Wanted’. It just goes to show that sometimes there *can* be value in the vigilante type programmes.

In the meantime, little ‘Pumpkin’ has been living In Southern China with her grandmother (Xiao Ping Liu), and seems to be settling down quietly. Best of luck to her.

In Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens said “the law is an ass” and over the years the legal system has shown that there was good reason for his comment. Since his day of course things have gone slowly and steadily downhill to the extent that in the UK a woman is being made to stand trial for throwing an apple core onto waste ground.

Kate Badger, a 25 year old from Wolverhampton was accused of throwing an apple core onto “knowingly causing the deposit of controlled waste, namely an apple core, on land which did not have a waste management licence.

Excuse me?? Threw ‘biodegradable’ material onto a waste site? Left to its own devices that apple core would have disintegrated back into the soil in days.

Big Brother seems to have spotted her society shattering lack of discretion and stepped in with a demand she pay a “£60 on-the-spot fine”. She refused… after all, let’s face it here, the entire notion is ludicrous but the law being an ass, got it’s ass into gear and proceeded with a prosecution.

However, in the first place she denies it and after appearing in the local Magistrates Court has elected to stand trial at Crown Court where. if convicted, she faces a prison term.

Personally I would suggest that the entire case has been blown up out of all proportion to the offence whether she did it or not. An apple core is surely in the same category of ‘controlled waste’ for example as a damaged sofa bed… or radioactive material. Is it *so* important the law must be adhered to in all its fine print? Isn’t there a case here for issuing a caution regardless of whether she admits it or not?

And the *cost* of all this must be astronomical… and for what?? So the law can ‘save face’?? Makes no sense at all.

Yet again another Australian was sentenced to death for heroin smuggling. This time it was Hong Viet Nguyen a 40 year old of Vietnamese descent caught with 95- grams of the drug in his clothes.

And how much did he sell his life for? Just US$10,000.

You have to wonder at what’s happening in these people’s minds that they are willing to take risks of this kind when they know what the inevitable result will be. The “Peoples Court” said :

“Prosecutors find that with the amount of heroin trafficked, the defendant deserved the highest and most severe punishment so that society can prevent this crime and have educational impact on others,”

It won’t prevent the crime or educate others of course, but that’s a side issue. It’s possible the sentence might be reduced to life imprisonment on appeal, as have the last few,  however I don’t think Australia has a prisoner exchange scheme with Vietnam, so  he may well find after a few years that death might have been a better deal. :(

Yet another pointless waste of a life.

Uncomfortable reports are surfacing around the globe about ‘confirmed’ DNA testing that ‘shows conclusively’ little Madeline McCann missing now for over 4 months was given sleeping tablets in a sufficiently high dose to kill her!

The DNA that produced these results is said to have been found in the boot of the hire car the McCann’s used on their holiday. There are also reports that Kate’s diary had references to how much stress the kids were causing her, especially Maddie’s high spirited nature. The conclusion reached by many seems to be that Kate McCann administered the drugs to the girl. Whether this was accidental or deliberate would be for a jury to decide *if* these results are both true, and sufficient to bring a case to trial.

If it was true of course we’d need to know how either of them would have (or could have) removed, and disposed of their little girls body to hide their culpability. Seems a bit of a horrible thing to suggest a parent might have done to their child… especially to such a cute little 4 year old girl.

Madeline McCann smiling

I’ve no idea if the reports are true or not… but if they *are* true then it’s a tragedy in many many ways. Not just for Maddie, but for her parents and siblings… and also for any other child that goes missing because people might be less inclined to give such fervent support to a search after this.

Hopefully she’ll turn up safe and well somewhere… but it’s getting increasingly less likely by the day… and by the leaked report :(

More on the story here.

I’ve little sympathy for the Bali Nine directly, other than the usual human concern for them. They knew what they were doing when they tried to smuggle drugs out of Indonesia. They knew the penalties included a death sentence and were prepared to take the risk. They lost.

On the other hand I have tremendous sympathy for the parents of Scott Rush, one of the Nine sentenced to death. The parents of the others haven’t made as much of a media splash as the Rush’s have and perhaps this is why their plight seems so much worse. Or maybe it’s that Scott was only 19 when he was arrested in Bali in 2005. It’s hard to say.

I can only imagine the heartache they must be suffering with their son in the clutches of a government not known to give clemency to drug smugglers and whose penalties for the crime are so extreme. It’s a tough enough job bringing kids up without this sort of pressure on the horizon.

Scott Rush 2006

No doubt they imagined him to be an ordinary larrikin sort of kid who’d settle down, marry and produce a few grandchildren eventually. The idea he’d either die in front of a firing squad or, if he was *lucky*, spend the rest of his life rotting in a Bali jail, probably never impinged on their consciousness, nor should it have. It’s all such a sad situation and such a waste of his and their lives… and of course their resources as they battle for his life though the court system.

And even if he is reprieved, it’s likely the death sentence would be replaced by minimum 30+ years in prison. What sort of life would he have to look forward to when he came out… if he ever did? Would they even be there to greet him… it’s just so sad to watch. :(

Feature on Bali Nine at: http://www.news.com.au/feature/0,,31317,00.html

One of the problems with giving police extreme powers is that on occasion they tend to use them badly.

Whilst APEC was on this week, a guy walking across the road in front of a motorcade was arrested in front of his 11 year old son and spent 22 hours in a cell with no access to a lawyer waiting to be freed. The basic story told like that seems almost reasonable. The police were intent on protecting the world leaders and that’s what they did.

However, on closer examination it seems they might well have stepped way over the line between caution and over reaction.

The entire story (so far) can be read here in and from reading it you can see how easy it is to fall foul of the law when simply going about your life doing nothing wrong.

Greg McLeay's arrest

This picture (from ninemsn) shows Greg being arrested and to be fair, whilst I know appearances can be deceiving, he really *does* look like an ordinary guy doing ordinary stuff.

As far as I could tell, the only crime this guy committed was to not realise Sydney had been turned into a virtual war zone where martial law was in force. I think in retrospect Greg McLeay will consider himself lucky not to have suffered the same fate as Jean Charles de Menezes in London in 2005 and have died for nothing.

Whatever else it is, was or might be… I just see this sort of behaviour as *very* unaustralian and is indicative of the way the fundamentals of our society have deteriorated under John Howard.

© 2007 - 2011 Opinion Australia Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha